NexosNexos
Customers

Teams shipping faster with Nexos

From solo open-source maintainers to B2B SaaS engineering teams, these are the people giving every branch its own URL — and what it has meant for their shipping cadence.

Used by teams at

LineworkPeridot LabsArchivaMapletrailKōan StudioNorthboundHalfLightTangent
Linework·B2B SaaS · Project management·12 engineers

Cut PR review time from three days to eight hours by giving every branch a URL

Review cycle time

−68%

PRs merged per week

+41%

Infra cost vs previous setup

−73%

Before Nexos, our reviewers would batch PRs at the end of the week because spinning up a local copy was a thirty-minute ordeal. Now every PR has a link. People click through in the thread and approve — or flag — the same day.
Sanja P. — Engineering Lead, Linework

Linework ships a collaborative project management tool built on Next.js, Postgres, and Redis. Their old workflow ran previews on a single shared staging cluster in AWS — every push required a Helm upgrade, every database change required a coordination Slack message.

They migrated to Nexos in two days. The Dockerfile already existed. The seed file was a one-line pg_dump of their anonymised staging database. Within the first week, every open pull request had its own URL in the PR description.

The real unlock was database persistence. Their QA team had been running the same seven-step onboarding flow for every regression test. With Nexos, they run it once, add a bug-repro test user, and that user survives every push on the branch until the bug is fixed.

Peridot Labs·Consumer · AI copilot for writers·5 engineers

Shipped a working AI demo from a branch URL straight into an investor call

Time from commit to shareable demo

47s

Previews per week

40+

Monthly preview bill

$18

We pushed the branch fifteen minutes before the call. The URL worked. The investor clicked through, typed in a prompt, watched the streaming response. We closed the round two weeks later.
Marko I. — Co-founder, Peridot Labs

Peridot builds an AI writing assistant with a Python FastAPI backend, a Redis queue, and a Next.js frontend. Their previous host charged per-service for every preview, which meant six services times four active branches — twenty-four always-on containers they were paying for even at night.

On Nexos, each preview is one environment with all services wired together. Paused environments stop billing immediately. Their preview bill went from $640/month to $18.

For investor demos, the team now branches from main, wires up a new feature over a weekend, and shares the URL in the same email as the deck. Zero ops. Zero coordination.

Archiva·Open-source · Developer tools·Solo founder + 2 contributors

Runs the entire open-source preview workflow on $9 a month

Monthly spend

$9

Active branches

14

Contributor response time

< 24h

I maintain an open source library with a docs site that rebuilds per branch so I can review contributor PRs. Netlify wanted real money for a hobby-scale workload. Nexos fits in my credit-card round-up change.
Ines H. — Founder, Archiva

Archiva is an open-source markdown tooling library. The maintainer runs a docs site that needs to rebuild for every contributor PR so she can preview their changes.

She needed something cheaper than the big SaaS options but with more polish than rolling her own review-apps script. Nexos free tier covered the first few branches; once she went past the quota, the per-second billing kicked in for pennies per build.

Contributors now get a preview link on their PR automatically. Her review time dropped from “I'll look when I'm at my desk” to “already did it on my phone”.

Want your team on this page?

Start a free project, share your experience, and we will write it up with you. You get a link in your pitch deck, we get the social proof.